what percentage of infertility cases are due to a cause involving only the male partner?
- Enquiry
- Open Access
- Published:
A unique view on male infertility effectually the globe
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology volume 13, Commodity number:37 (2015) Cite this article
Abstract
Groundwork
Infertility affects an estimated 15% of couples globally, amounting to 48.5 million couples. Males are found to be solely responsible for 20-xxx% of infertility cases and contribute to 50% of cases overall. However, this number does not accurately represent all regions of the world. Indeed, on a global level, there is a lack of accurate statistics on rates of male infertility. Our report examines major regions of the earth and reports rates of male person infertility based on data on female infertility.
Methods
Our search consisted of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and population-based studies by searching the terms "epidemiology, male infertility, and prevalence." We identified 16 articles for detailed written report. Nosotros typically used the supposition that l% of all cases of infertility are due to female factors alone, 20-30% are due to male factors alone, and the remaining 20-30% are due to a combination of male and female factors. Therefore, in regions of the world where male cistron or rates of male infertility were not reported, nosotros used this assumption to summate full general rates of male person factor infertility.
Results
Our calculated information showed that the distribution of infertility due to male factor ranged from 20% to 70% and that the percentage of infertile men ranged from 2·v% to 12%. Infertility rates were highest in Africa and Cardinal/Eastern Europe. Additionally, according to a variety of sources, rates of male infertility in North America, Australia, and Cardinal and Eastern Europe varied from 4 5-6%, 9%, and 8-12%, respectively.
Determination
This study demonstrates a novel and unique way to summate the distribution of male infertility around the globe. According to our results, at least 30 million men worldwide are infertile with the highest rates in Africa and Eastern Europe. Results indicate further research is needed regarding etiology and treatment, reduce stigma & cultural barriers, and constitute a more than precise calculation.
Background
Infertility is a worldwide trouble, and according to Sharlip et al, it affects 15% of couples that accept unprotected intercourse [1]. Although this statistic is unremarkably cited, it is an affiliation of numbers taken from around the world and thus does not reflect rates in specific countries and regions. On a global calibration, accurate information regarding rates of male infertility is acutely defective, and has not been accurately reported.
Computing regionally based male person infertility rates is challenging for a number of reasons. First, population surveys generally interview couples or female partners of a couple who take unprotected intercourse and wish to have children. This is a very specific population. As such, data from a significant number of infertile individuals is never included, which may bias the data.
2nd, different female person infertility, male infertility is not well reported in general merely especially in countries where cultural differences and patriarchal societies may forbid accurate statistics from being collected and compiled. For case, in Northern Africa and Middle East, the female partner is often blamed for infertility. Men, therefore, practise not usually agree to undergo fertility evaluation, resulting in underreporting of male infertility. Furthermore, polygamy is a common practice in many cultures [2]. I of the reasons for polygamy is to overcome infertility and increase the probability of having children. Additionally, in some African countries, the tradition of "Chiramu" allows an infertile male person to bring in a brother or a relative to impregnate his married woman [2]. In this way, the man retains his masculine identity and condition in his customs's eyes.
A third challenge stems from the fact that male person infertility has never been divers as a affliction, which has resulted in sparse statistics. Additionally, demographic and clinical studies vary in epidemiological definition of infertility. While many clinical studies accept examined infertility over the course of a yr, several demographic studies examine infertility over a five-twelvemonth project [3]. Finally, while some studies only examine females, others only examine the men presenting to infertility clinics, which are generally small groups who are not representative of the larger population of infertile men.
Without accurate, region-specific information, it is not possible to identify and comprehensively care for infertile men. Therefore, to bridge this gap in knowledge, we have consolidated current data and, where contempo information is lacking, estimated rates of male infertility using pre-existing data on female infertility in areas around the globe. We focused especially on Due north America, Latin America and the Caribbean, North Africa and the Heart Eastward, Sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, Eastern Europe, Fundamental Asia, East asia, the Pacific, and Australia. The developing globe has much less data available, which is why the in a higher place regions were selected.
Therefore, the goal of this commentary is to consolidate the big breadth of information bachelor on male infertility and provide answers to the following 2 questions: How does the rate of male infertility vary in the different regions across the world? Tin authentic estimates of male person infertility exist captured globally while identifying potential socio-economic and cultural reporting barriers that skew the results?
Methods
We limited our literature search to include only systematic reviews and meta-analyses (where possible) of mainly population-based studies. For factors that did not generate a result for meta-assay or systematic review using the Boolean terms: "cistron" AND systematic review" or "factor" AND meta-analysis,", a search was done using that particular factor, due east.1000. "cistron" AND male infertility" to arm-twist an original study that looked into the issue of that cistron on any aspect of male person infertility. We searched PubMed, Spider web of Knowledge, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost and Google Scholar using the following keywords: epidemiology, male infertility, and prevalence (Figure 1).
Flow nautical chart demonstrating methodology. This effigy is a representation of our methods, including number of articles institute and filtered, and inclusion and exclusion criteria for the last commodity selection.
We initially identified 86 relevant articles in our multiple searches. Of those, 62 articles were excluded due to reporting of fertility rather than infertility, discussion of risk factors rather than statistics regarding overarching infertility, or lack of information regarding prevalence of infertility. From the remaining 24 articles, we further shortened the listing to sixteen manufactures that contained the most relevant information for our study. Most of these articles looked at a one-year definition of infertility. Mascarenhaas and colleagues used a v-year demographic definition of male infertility in their study [3]. Our report uses the definition of infertility pertaining to ane year. Nonetheless, we report the numbers used by Mascarenhas and colleagues likewise.
Statistical analysis
Information technology has been stated that 48.five 1000000 couples that take unprotected intercourse suffer from infertility worldwide [iv]. All the same, this statistic does not clearly define infertility by geographic region. Additionally, many clinical studies do not brainstorm to explore infertility until a couple attempts to get meaning for at least one yr co-ordinate to the World Health Arrangement (WHO). Demographic studies, on the other hand, wait at infertility over a v-year projection [iii]. In general, co-ordinate to Sharlip, 50% of infertility cases are due to a solely female factor, pure male person factor accounts for 20-30% of the problem, and the remaining xx-xxx% is due to a combination of both male and female factors [1]. Nosotros used the "Sharlip cistron" as a basis for calculations because it was the most widely cited and reported statistic regarding male infertility. Farther, a more than authentic statistic is as of notwithstanding, unavailable. Therefore we used the same parameters to calculate the statistics establish in this report. In regions where the prevalence of male infertility was not reported, we calculated male infertility statistics utilizing female infertility rates. This statistic was calculated by using the reported rate of infertility in that region. We applied Sharlip's estimate that approximately 20-30% of the total infertile couple population could be attributed to male infertility [1]. Nosotros calculated percentages, such every bit each region's total infertile male population. Using a combination of these 2 numbers, we were able to calculate an estimated number of infertile men. To further explain how our numbers were calculated, we provide an instance. Information was taken from the WHO regarding infertility rates equally reported by female person partners in regions of the earth. In Sub-Saharan Africa, xiv.2% of women reported infertility. From this, nosotros assumed with couples infertility at 14.2%, then female factor infertility would exist 7.one%. Since the other 50% is assumed to be a combination of male factor and combined factor infertility, we calculated 20-30% of 7.1% to arrive at solely male gene infertility and xl-55% of seven.1% to go far at any situation when the male factor is involved in any manner.
Results
The calculated global data shows that the percent of infertility that is owing to males ranged between 20-70% (Table one). Additionally, the pct of infertile males in these countries varied from 2.5-12% (Table 1). The largest pockets of male infertility occurred in Key and Eastern Europe (8% to 12%) and Australia (8% to 9%). North America demonstrates rates of male infertility 4.5-6% [4]. While a calculated percentage reveals 4.5-6% of North American males are infertile, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that ix.iv% of males in the United states of america are infertile (Table 1) [4]. Sub-Saharan Africa is typically thought to have loftier rates of infertility; nevertheless, possibly due to underreporting, the rates shown in Table one appear low. The CDC and the WHO exercise not utilise the Sharlip calculation when reporting their data. Rather, their rates are based upon in-person interviews of representative populations, whereas Sharlip'due south data is based upon previously reported data from a classic French study. What makes our data novel is the fact that we use the information that is representative of the population examined. For example, when calculating current infertility rates in Due north America, we employ information from the CDC, which is representative of the N American population. Nevertheless, this same data is not representative of the Sub-Saharan population. We therefore used female data from the WHO combined with the representative rates reported past Sharlip to calculate male person infertility in those regions.
Table 2 takes data from a WHO study conducted from 1994-2000. North and West Africa had the highest rates of infertility, which ranged from 4.24%-half dozen.35%. Central and East Asia had the lowest rates of infertility, with 2·05%-3.07% of infertility cases due to male factor alone (Tabular array 2). Cases of infertility due to both male person and female factors ranged from two.84% in Sub-Saharan Africa to xi.65% in Northern and Western Africa.
Table 3 shows infertility data in terms of regional populations. While most of our data was reported equally percentages, nosotros converted them into population absolute numbers in order to gain a broader understanding and possibly more authentic estimate of the number of infertile men. The number of infertile men ranged from five,000 to 18,000,000 with a worldwide estimate of 30,625,864 to 30,641,262 men who may be infertile. The highest number of infertile men was concentrated in Europe. Co-ordinate to this table, in any given region, at least 5,459 men may be infertile (Table three).
Table four extrapolates male person data from pre-existing female data reported in a systematic analysis conducted past the WHO. The rates of primary infertility, as reported past women, ranged from ane.5% to 2.6%, which were much lower than those reported over the form of 12 or more months. The male person contribution to these rates of infertility ranged from 0.iv% to 1.82% according to WHO estimates. Secondary infertility reported past women ranged from vii.ii% to 18%, with the highest rates in Central and Eastern Europe, followed by S Asia at 12.two% and Sub-Saharan Africa at 11.65%. This information consolidated information between 1990 and 2010, providing a 5-twelvemonth project of infertility [3]. Co-ordinate to this data, the highest rates of infertility were concentrated through Africa and Key/Eastern Europe [iii].
Tabular array five shows male infertility data (reported in earlier studies) from France, Western Siberia, Nigeria, Mongolia, Poland/Eastern Europe, Egypt, Islamic republic of iran, and Sudan [5-9]. We found that half dozen.4% to 42.4% of infertility cases in these areas were due to a male factor.
Word
Global
Male person infertility is a global population health concern. There are an estimated 48·5 million couples with infertility worldwide [3]. In the electric current study, nosotros calculated rates of male person infertility beyond the world based on a review of the current literature (Figure 2). Since nosotros practice not know the actual rates of infertility, most of the numbers shown are based on cocky-written report, thus encompass a wide range. Overall, past examining the available literature and consolidating the information, our data indicates that global rates of male infertility range from 2.5% to 12%.
World map containing percentages of infertility cases per region that are due to male factor. This effigy demonstrates rates of infertility cases in each region studied (N America, Latin America, Africa, Europe, Key/Eastern Europe, Middle Due east, Asia, and Oceania) due to male person factor interest.
North America and Europe
North America, Europe and Australia are adult countries, which may explain why rates of infertility are reportedly believed to be more than accurate when compared to less developed countries. In North America, 4·5%-half-dozen% of males are infertile (Table 1). This number is like to that of Australia, where 8% of males are infertile and 9% of males over the age of 40 take visited an infertility clinic at some point (Tabular array 1) and Europe, where 7.5% of males are infertile. These numbers are based upon data from the National Wellness Statistics Report (NHSR) from the CDC National Health Interview Survey, the Australian Establish for Health and Welfare (AIHW), and the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for male infertility [iv,ten,eleven]. These three regions of the world were the only organizations with the virtually authentic reporting of information available. The estimation that 20-xxx% of infertility is due to a sole male factor helped calculate numbers in the developing world, providing the most conclusive study of male infertility around the world. Quantifying the available data gives u.s. insight into where the greatest need is for farther enquiry into underlying etiology and treatment.
When comparing regions with another, Europe reports similar population estimates every bit the United states of america, with 15% of European couples and 7.five% of men reported infertile [xi]. Olsen and colleagues found that infertility varied across Europe. Subsequently 12 months, 51.1%, 43.ii%, 37.9%, xix.i%, and 43.two% of couples sought help for infertility in Denmark, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, respectively, with approximately 40% seeking assist across the sample [12]. A classical French study completed past Thonneau and colleagues in 1991 examined 1686 infertile couples and institute that in a pocket-sized region of France to discover that abnormal infertility was nowadays in males 20% of the time, and present in females 34% of the time, and in both males and females 38% of the time [13]. This region is different from the whole of Europe, and statistics are sparse. Still, Sanocka and colleagues state that Poland's population is considered representative of Eastern Europe [xiv]. That report stated that 20% of couples are infertile in Poland, and 40-60% of those couples' cases are due to male gene alone, whereas a more contempo study past Bablok and colleagues states that 56% of infertility cases are due to an involved male person factor [6,14]. The about interesting part of our manuscript references the fact that all these numbers reported are so unlike. We conclude that the big varieties in these numbers are largely due to cultural differences. In the United States and Europe, infertility is a problem that men often feel comfy addressing with their physician. This allows the problem to both go addressed and reported statistically.
Australia
We see that Commonwealth of australia's rates are like to those in North America and the Us, at 8-nine%; additionally, 40% of infertility cases in Australia are due to male factor involvement (Tables one and 3; Effigy 1) [10,fifteen]. While the Australian Constitute for Health and Welfares (AIHW) statistics data is on males aged twoscore and older, the AIHW states that 8% of males have reported trying to have children unsuccessfully and 9% are being evaluated for infertility [10].
Africa and the infertility chugalug
The rates in North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Eastern Europe are close to some of the college percentages of male infertility estimated worldwide (Table 2) [16]. Male factor involvement for Tabular array 2 was calculated using the statistics found past Cates, Farley, and Rowe in 1985 [17]. With the discovery that male infertility is well-nigh prevalent throughout this region, this may be where marketing for assisted reproductive therapy, treatment for infection, and efforts for WHO research tin can be concentrated.
The highest numbers relate to a region known as the "African Infertility Chugalug," which stretches east to west across central Africa from Gabon to the United Republic of Tanzania [18]. This region of the world has very high rates of infertility in women, and as men are involved in up to 43% of the problem, the argument follows that male infertility is also high in this region [17,xix,20]. Male factor contribution to infertility is also extremely high in the shut geographical region of the Center Eastward [21]. We also noticed that primary infertility rates were much lower than secondary infertility. This may consequence from the loftier corporeality of child marriage and young pregnancy occurring in developing countries, and the subsequently development of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and pelvic infections [22]. Nonetheless, these numbers are of questionable significance due to the scant nature of their collection. Additionally, the population of sub-saharan Africa grows yearly. This does non imply that the rates of male infertility may not exist high, but rather that the population may be growing in other means. Typically, in regions of Africa and other societies, the male is seen as the ascendant private in both the customs and the family structure. Therefore, men, peculiarly in Africa and the Middle E exercise not report their infertility, as they believe it is emasculating to be unable to impregnate a woman. As a result of this, the men in these societies peculiarly tend to arraign females for the lack of child and exercise not get assist.
Other diseases
The "African Infertility Belt" also has loftier rates of STDs such as N. gonnorrhoeae and C. trachomatis, which may have some correlation and human relationship with the high rates of infertility in this region of the earth [23]. Collet and co-workers discovered that a tubal factor was present in 82.8% of females presenting to infertility clinics and frequently positive endocervical cultures for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis [23].
Full absolute numbers calculated
Nosotros take fatigued on the arguments that approximately 50% of cases are due to women, and twenty-30% of cases are due to men. The remaining 20-30% of infertility cases is due to a combination of male and female factors. In Tabular array 1, multiple reports country an infertility rate of anywhere from 2.v% to 12% [half-dozen,10,11,14,xx,21]. Total numbers of infertile men worldwide may amount from 30,625,864 to 30,641,262 (Table iii). This number does non include estimates from Latin America or Asia (the most populous continent on the planet), due to underreporting at that place. These numbers indicate over 30 1000000 more men and their female counterparts who could benefit from assisted reproductive technology (ART) and handling for infertility. Additionally, regardless of the lower rates of infertility in North America, Europe, and Australia, these regions should not be neglected in the research for future treatment options. These regions also make up a function of the worldwide infertility phenomenon. While there may be regions of Africa and Asia attracting more urgent attention, this same consideration should be extended globally.
Updated WHO guidelines
In 2010, the WHO inverse their guidelines for semen analysis for the diagnosis of the infertile male person [24]. In doing and then, they established reference values that were much lower than their previous ones, resulting in more men qualifying as "normal" [6]. At present, a human with reference values of greater than xv million sperm, greater than 5% normal morphology, and xl% progressive motion would be considered normal. [25] With the new guidelines, more men would exist considered fertile, while there may be an unnoticed rise in the number of infertile men. Therefore, a recent study involving our group advises circumspection when interpreting the new WHO reference values considering they have non notwithstanding been accurately defined to discriminate fertile from infertile men [25].
Limitations of our report
One major limitation of our written report is the number of infertile couples who have never participated in intercourse. Following this limitation, nosotros therefore cannot approximate the number of infertile men who have never participated in unprotected sexual intercourse. Boosted limitations of any epidemiological study regarding infertility and sexual activity include that the quality of data varies from very poor to very good. Reproductive information is private and couples may not be inclined to be truthful in surveys [26]. Many men may not be willing to participate in semen studies [26]. Another limitation included the divergence betwixt one-year infertility rates and the 5-year infertility rates reported by Mascarenhas et al. [3]. This difference in rates over a v-yr projection may be due to the fact that over 5 years, the cases of infertility may either resolve, these couples may have found an culling to traditional conception, or the written report could have suffered from compunction. A major limitation of this study is that much of our data are based on WHO studies from the 1900's and that the definition of a male person factor in these studies was non well defined. Male person cistron infertility was based on both abnormal semen analyses and on associated factors like varicoceles and urogenital infections, and STDs in men with normal semen analyses. In countries with an authentic registration of diseases, the prevalence of both male infertility and male cistron leading to couples' infertility is lower than that in developing countries. Rates from developing countries are more likely due to a trouble with definition of male infertility and lack of accurate reporting rather than a truthful reflection of male infertility in those regions. Finally, the biggest limitation was that we based our calculations on Sharlip et al. and applied these numbers for female infertility to that of men.
Conclusions
According to our results, at least 30 million men worldwide are infertile with the highest rates in Africa and Eastern Europe. However, due to the varying credibility and older nature of many of the articles analyzed, information technology is quite difficult to make a definite conclusion on the nature of these infertility rates.
The chief bulletin of these findings is that male infertility is a global wellness issue that has non been researched or studied to truly empathise its magnitude and prevalence. This information provides insight into where the greatest need is for farther research into underlying etiology and treatment. The major recommendations of this manuscript are:
- 1.
Equally a society, we must reduce barriers from stigmas associated with infertility due to religious and cultural beliefs.
- 2.
Nosotros must create a globally accepted population-based calculation in club to sympathize the prevalence and magnitude of male infertility.
- 3.
Much work is needed to raise awareness about male infertility.
With broad and authentic understanding, we can both care for infertility past managing underlying atmospheric condition.
Abbreviations
- Art:
-
Assisted reproductive technology
- AIHW:
-
Australian institute for health and welfare
- CDC:
-
Centers for disease control
- EAU:
-
European clan of urology
- NHSR:
-
National health statistics report
- STDs:
-
Sexually transmitted diseases
- WHO:
-
World Wellness Organization
References
-
Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, Lipshultz LI, Sigman M, Thomas AJ, et al. All-time practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:873–82.
-
Matetakufa SN. Infertility: Our Own Gift. New Internationalist. 1998. http://newint.org/features/1998/07/05/infertility/ Accessed 17 December 2014.
-
Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001356.
-
Martinez K, Daniels K, Chandra A. Fertility of men and women aged 15-44 years in the The states: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010. Natl Health Stat Study. 2012;51:1–28.
-
Winters BR, Walsh TJ. The Epidemiology of Male Infertility. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41:195–204.
-
Bablok L, Dziadecki Due west, Szymusik I, Wolczynski Due south, Kurzawa R, Pawelczyk L, et al. Patterns of infertility in Poland - multicenter study. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011;32:799–804.
-
Inhorn MC, Kiss KA. Ethnography, epidemiology and infertility in Egypt. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:671–86.
-
Aflatoonian A, Seyedhassani SM, Tabibnejad North. The epidemiological and etiological aspects of infertility in Yazd province of Islamic republic of iran. Iran J Reprod Med. 2009;seven:117–22.
-
Elussein EA, Magid YM, Omer MM, Adam I. Clinical patterns and major causes of infertility among Sudanese couples. Trop Doct. 2008;38:243–four.
-
Collins HP, Kalisch D. The health of Commonwealth of australia's males. Health. Canberra: Australian Establish of Health and Welfare; 2011.
-
Jungwirth A, Giwercman A, Tournaye H, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Dohle G, et al. European clan of urology guidelines on male infertility: the 2012 update. Eur Urol. 2012;62:324–32.
-
Olsen J, Kuppers-Chinnow M, Spinelli A. Seeking medical help for subfecundity: a report based upon surveys in 5 European countries. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:95–100.
-
Thonneau P, Marchand South, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, Lansac J, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988-1989). Hum Reprod. 1991;6:811–half-dozen.
-
Sanocka D, Kurpisz K. Infertility in Poland–nowadays condition, reasons and prognosis equally a reflection of Central and Eastern Europe bug with reproduction. Med Sci Monit. 2003;nine:SR16–20.
-
McLachlan RI, de Kretser DM. Male infertility: the instance for connected research. Med J Aust. 2001;174:116–7.
-
Rutstein SO, Shah IH. Infecundity, infertility, and childlessness in developing countries. DHS Comparative Reports No. 9. Geneva: World Wellness Organization; 2004.
-
Cates W, Farley TM, Rowe PJ. Worldwide patterns of infertility: is Africa different? The Lancet. 1985;326:596–8.
-
Sembuya R. Mother or nothing: the agony of infertility. Balderdash World Health Organ. 2010;88:881–2.
-
Ikechebelu J, Adinma J, Orie Eastward, Ikegwuonu S. High prevalence of male infertility in southeastern Nigeria. J Obstetrics Gynecology. 2003;23:657–9.
-
Araoye MO. Epidemiology of infertility: social problems of the infertile couples. West Afr J Med. 2004;22:190–6.
-
Inhorn MC. Middle Eastern masculinities in the age of new reproductive technologies: male infertility and stigma in Egypt and Lebanon. Med Anthropol Q. 2004;18:162–82.
-
Lunenfeld B, Van Steirteghem A, on behalf of all participants. Infertility in the tertiary millennium: implications for the private, family unit and club: Condensed Meeting Report from the Bertarelli Foundation's Second Global Conference. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10:317–26.
-
Collet Chiliad, Reniers J, Frost Due east, Gass R, Yvert F, Leclerc A, et al. Infertility in Central Africa: infection is the cause. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988;26:423–8.
-
Cooper TG, Noonan E, Eckardstein Due south, Auger J, Baker HWG, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organisation reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:231–45.
-
Esteves SC, Zini A, Aziz North, Alvarez JG, Sabanegh ES, Agarwal A. Critical Appraisal of Earth Health Organization'due south New Reference Values for Human Semen Characteristics and Effect on Diagnosis and Treatment of Subfertile Men. Urology. 2012;79:16–22.
-
Wilcox AJ. Fertility and pregnancy: an epidemiologic perspective. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
-
Philippov OS, Radionchenko AA, Bolotova VP, Voronovskaya NI, Potemkina TV. Estimation of the prevalence and causes of infertility in western Siberia. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(2):183.
-
Bayasgalan G, Naranbat D, Tsedmaa B, Tsogmaa B, Sukhee D, Amarjargal O, et al. Clinical patterns and major causes of infertility in Mongolia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30:386–93.
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by the fiscal back up from the Eye for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Dispensary, USA. Authors give thanks Amy Slugg Moore for editorial assistance.
Author data
Affiliations
Corresponding writer
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
AA conceived the idea, supervised the study, and edited the commodity for submission. AM conducted the literature review, writing of the manuscript, information assay and calculations, and prepared the article for submission. AH and MC helped with the reviewing and editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
This is an Open Admission article distributed under the terms of the Artistic Eatables Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted utilise, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Artistic Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/aught/1.0/) applies to the data fabricated available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Reprints and Permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agarwal, A., Mulgund, A., Hamada, A. et al. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13, 37 (2015). https://doi.org/x.1186/s12958-015-0032-1
-
Received:
-
Accustomed:
-
Published:
-
DOI : https://doi.org/ten.1186/s12958-015-0032-1
Keywords
- Male infertility
- Global health
- Fecundity
- Worldwide
Source: https://rbej.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1
0 Response to "what percentage of infertility cases are due to a cause involving only the male partner?"
Post a Comment